This is his post on the fb group
"A retired politician should remain retired and not try to meddle in political affairs anymore.. Look at former MIC and MCA heads.. they disappeared from the picture.. Mamak kutty when la wana retire.."
Here come my comment
Woah bro ****, take a chill pill.
First of all, why a retired politician need to keep quiet? Is there law requirement for this? I thought freedom of speech mean everyone can speak his mind without fear of persecution and prosecution. It is up to him whether he one to meddle or not. Everybody wants to meddle in every affair. The difference is whether they actually able to do or not. You asking 'when he wants to retire'. Could it be when you in position of power 'when he wants to retire' become 'one more word and your a$$ will be in prison' ?
Secondly, what with the "Mamak kutty" thingy? Judging from you pic profile, and the fact that you calling him mamak, aren't you and this "mamak kutty" is from the same Indian subcontinent? (Correct me if i'm wrong) Malays who dislike him emphasize his mamak lineage, trying to sling mud at him. You aping these Malay make me chuckle.
Btw, this mamak becomes dictator in Malaysia for 22 year, bringing corruption and destruction people say. I say, well so much for Malay supremacy, the Perkasa people talk c*ck only, mamak have become dictators in their land, pissing on their head.
About giving citizenship, the first link you posted, the writer wrote:
" Former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad admitted that during his tenure, he had given citizenship to Filipino refugees in Sabah who were able to meet all the requirements. "
Well if the mamak told it is according to requirement then whats the problem? All we need to do is to check whether giving citizenship is according to the law of that time. File a police report, sue him or whatever. Just screaming this mamak kutty is corrupt regarding this matter is only mud slinging.
Bring proof that what he have done regarding giving citizenship is wrong according to law, and we deport these people back to their native countries.
The guy
u didnt adress about the second link..thats proof why him giving citizenshiop is not right.. check it out beroo..
Owh actually comment regarding to your post, my mind have veered away. That is not proof, that is allegation. The writer didn't point which section of the law the guy broke. By just saying the goverment giving citizenship in secret does not cut it. That just " you said he said"
i think that proof, not allegation.. using Tunku as an example is just leaving a bad aftertaste..
*END OF DISCUSSION*
Here is the link
No comments:
Post a Comment